dc.contributor.author |
Awan, Sadia Waheed |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-11-05T06:27:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-11-05T06:27:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://10.250.8.41:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10062 |
|
dc.description |
Supervisor: Dr. Sajid Saleem |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Wireless Sensor Networks are composed of tiny electronic device sensor nodes
and are capable of sensing the information of external environment. Sensor
nodes are also capable of computing and transmitting the information to end
users with the help of sink node. Sensor nodes are dependent on the battery
being used in it. Battery get depleted very fast because node has to perform
computation as well as communication operations.
Energy efficiency is major challenging problems in wireless sensor networks
(WSNs). In this paper, we have focused on optimized location of
cluster heads (CHs) for energy efficiency in a hybrid WSN (that consists of
both mobile and static sensors). LEACH is a very good method for clustering
in a WSN consisting solely of static sensors with uniform energy capabilities.
Our proposed clustering schemes suggest simple and static clustering strategy
for a hybrid WSN and we explore whether their performance is improved
relative to LEACH. Mobile sensors act as CHs and also harvest energy from
their harvesting module. Our proposed schemes divide the total network
covered area into cells based upon different criterion. In the first approach,
named as the regular grid (RG) approach, a CH is simply placed in the center
of each cell. The Minimax Grid (MG) attempts at improving the lifetime
by relocating the CH from cell center to the center of the smallest enclosing
circle. The more complicated KM approach first divides the network
into clusters and then solves a facility location problem to assign the role of
CHs to the mobile sensors. Simulation results show that RG, MG and KM
perform better than LEACH algorithm in terms of energy consumption and
consequently increases the lifetime of network. The relative improvement of
KM and MG over RG is marginal as the number of energy harvesting (EH)
sensors increase in network. |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
SEECS, National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Information Technology, Wireless Sensor Networks |
en_US |
dc.title |
Hierarchical Clustering for Heterogeneous Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |