NUST Institutional Repository

Potential of Floating PV Power Plant Deployed on lakes for Partial Electricity Supply: A Case study of NUST Lake /

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hafeez, Hamza
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-16T07:17:31Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-16T07:17:31Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.identifier.other 319087
dc.identifier.uri http://10.250.8.41:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/28092
dc.description Supervisor : Dr. Adeel Waqas en_US
dc.description.abstract Water bodies like small lakes, canals, and rivers in urban areas serve to be a way forward to deploy photovoltaic technology with no constraints to involve land procurement. This research aims to estimate the potential deployment of a floating photovoltaic system on an urban lake site to assess its scope and compare it with a similar specification on-ground photovoltaic system. System Advisor Model (SAM) has been used for techno-economic analysis of a site in Pakistan. The technical analysis involves observing the effect of real time temperature drop and calculation of water reduction efficiency for FPV systems. The economic parameters like net present value (NPV) and payback period are used to judge the economic feasibility of the floating photovoltaic deployment project. The floating photovoltaic deployment in an urban area is subject to soiling as the water reservoir being used exists in an area close to or within the city boundaries. The required cleaning water costs a one-time extraction rate of $1435, while for a floating photovoltaic system, the extraction cost is estimated to be $1.35. Under standard temperature conditions (STC) one-year capacity factor turns out to be 0.70% more, producing an additional energy yield of 64 kWh/kW for lake scenarios when a 10 °C temperature drop is considered. The total power potential for the entire NUST Lake turns out to be 4.47 MW. A 1 MW FPV system in NUST lake would result in a water reduction efficiency of 11.6%/year. Under standard temperature conditions, the net present value for the on-ground system becomes negative while it remains optimistic for the floating photovoltaic system as no land costs are required. Similarly, once the land cost is included in the feasibility analysis, the payback period for the on-ground system goes beyond 15 years which is only 5.37 years for a floating photovoltaic system signifying the economic feasibility of the floating photovoltaic project. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E), NUST en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries TH-323
dc.subject System Advisor Model (SAM) en_US
dc.subject PV systems en_US
dc.subject Floating PV systems en_US
dc.subject Solar Energy en_US
dc.subject Economic Feasibility en_US
dc.subject Technoeconomic Analysis en_US
dc.subject MS-ESE Thesis en_US
dc.title Potential of Floating PV Power Plant Deployed on lakes for Partial Electricity Supply: A Case study of NUST Lake / en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MS [267]

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Context