dc.contributor.author |
Aayesha Arif, Supervised by Dr. Hasan Sajid |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-03T05:26:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-03T05:26:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://10.250.8.41:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/28569 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a laboratory technique used for
detecting and locating a specific DNA sequence on a chromosome. It is one of the
preliminary tests for diagnosis of many types of cancers and prenatal abnormalities. It is
also used for identifying the course of treatment for cancer patients. A fluorochrome
mix, also called a probe, is used to label parts of chromosomal regions or genes. These
marked chromosomal regions appear as brightly colored spots (referred to as signals)
against the DAPI stained blue nucleus. The presence (or absence), and counts of these
spots in 100 to 200 cells translates to the result of the test. The analysis for the test is
typically performed manually and requires two expert technologists for scoring and
validation. The turnaround time for the test is very high and costs many hours in expert
time. The technologist observes a FISH sample slide under the microscope and uses a
manual counter to keep count of the signals and patterns visible in the nuclei. FISH
slide quality deteriorates over time with the fluorescence intensity fading, and the same
slide kept for over a month can not be analyzed again even if stored properly. There are
several automated solutions available in the market like Abbott BioView, 3DHistech
Pannoramic Scan, etc. The cost of these automated systems is in orders of millions of
US dollars. Despite this, the automated analysis through these systems has been found
to require considerable manual intervention. The proposed solution integrates a color
camera with a traditional fluorescence microscope for capturing fields of view as the
technologist observes the FISH slide under the microscope. The captured images are
analyzed by a robust deep learning pipeline to deliver the final scores of the patterns
observed in the nuclei. The raw images are captured at multiple focus levels,
preprocessed and stacked together to form a final composite image for each field of
view. The stacked images then pass through a multiclass nucleus detector that detects
the viable and non viable nuclei of different types. The viable nuclei are fed to a
segmenter that extracts the signal boundaries. A signal classifier then assigns a color
label to each of these signals. For the sake of ease of analysis, each nucleus is
transformed into a pseudo or false image that has a very bright nucleus background
5
with clearly visible signals. The count and type of signal observed against every nucleus
is then reported as the final score. The type of abnormal patterns for sample and probe
types are known. Laboratory cut-offs for each probe pattern are used to classify
observed patterns as abnormal or normal. The final output of the pipeline is pattern
scores in percentages and pseudo images, which delivers these results in order of
milliseconds, reducing the analysis time from hours to seconds. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
SMME |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
SMME-TH-680; |
|
dc.subject |
Deep Learning, FISH, Automation, Fluorescence, Cancer, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Deep Learning in healthcare |
en_US |
dc.title |
Novel Deep Learning Pipeline for Automated Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Analysis |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |