Abstract:
Due to rapid increase in construction activities over the past few decades, the importance
of ground improvement techniques has increased manifold. Ground improvement
techniques are numerous but the basic aim is to improve the engineering parameters of
problematic soils so as to achieve desired properties. Stone columns reinforce soft soil
owing to their high stiffness, strength and increase in drainage path. Different models have
been used to predict load-settlement behavior of soil treated by stone columns. The load
carrying capacity of stone columns is dependent on various parameters which provide an
insight into their load-sharing mechanism. This research aims at investigating the effects
of floating stone columns in clayey soil with silty deposits by developing small-scale
laboratory models. A comparison is made between untreated and single stone column
treated soil by varying the undrained shear strength of soil and L/D ratio of stone column.
Effect of group columns is investigated in terms of varying spacing among them. Based on
rigorous testing conducted in laboratory, soil parameters have been identified to develop
accurate numerical models in PLAXIS 2D software. It is inferred from comparison
between the two that results of small-scale laboratory testing are in close agreement with
results from FEM. The undrained shear strength of soil affects the applicability of stone
columns as a ground improvement technique and the stone columns are effective in the
range of low to medium shear strength soil (Su<54KPa). There exists a critical length of
column beyond which the load carrying capacity does not significantly increase. (L/D= 4 –
5.5). Group effect of columns is more pronounced at closer spacing and is found
negligible beyond S/D=3. Bulging failure is observed in single stone column loaded in
compression and the effect of bulging is prominent at 1.5–2D from the top. However
group columns do not fail by bulging. The small scale testing is effective to predict load
settlement behavior of stone columns in field however controlled environment should be
vi
available for conducting testing. Further research is needed to address the effects of curing
time, encasing of columns and varying diameter of stone columns.