Abstract:
The first question to answer should be: what is an ecohouse?
Eco-architecture sees buildings as part of the larger ecology of
the planet and the building as part of a living habitat. This
contrasts with the more common notions of many architects,
who see a building as a work of art, perhaps on exhibition in a
settlement or as ‘frozen music’ in the people-less pictures of
glossy magazines. Some architects see the process of design as
a production line with the building as a product to be deposited
on a site, regardless of its particular environment or qualities. You
will see from the case studies at the end of the book that
ecohouses are closely connected to their site, society, climate,
region and the planet.
Why bother making buildings connect in this way? Because the
alternative is not acceptable and ‘modern buildings’ are literally
destroying the planet. It does not help that the numbers of people
on the planet are growing so rapidly (5.3 billion in 1990; 8.1 billion
by 2020; 10.7 billion in the 2080s) or that we have increasingly
sophisticated technologies to exploit the Earth’s natural resources.
But it should be widely known that buildings are the single most
damaging polluters on the planet, consuming over half of all the
energy used in developed countries and producing over half of all
climate-change gases.
The shift towards green design began in the 1970s and was a
pragmatic response to higher oil prices. It was then that the first
of the oil shocks, in 1973, sent fossil fuel prices sky high and the
‘futurologists’ began to look at the life history of fossil fuels on the
planet and make claims about how much oil and gas were left.
Their predictions were alarming and, 30 years on, we appear still
to have abundant oil. However, their calculations on total reserves
were fairly accurate and many of their predictions have yet to be
proved wrong. From the features on gas, oil and coal below you
can see that it is now estimated that we have left around 40 years