Abstract:
This work is an updated version of the Small Jail Design Guide originally
published in 1988. It updates and expands upon the original work, adding
new and revised graphics. It removes dated references to standards and
adds several new sections. The illustrative designs at the end of the original
Small Jail Design Guide are not included in this edition.
In reviewing the original document it was realized that many of the concepts
discussed apply equally to most jails, including those regarded as medium
size (100 to 200 beds). Thus, after appropriate editing, the document was
renamed Jail Design Guide: A Resource for Small and Medium-Sized Jails.
In 1985, Kimme Planning and Architecture (now Kimme & Associates,
Inc.) compiled survey information on 255 jails of 50 beds or less ("small
jails") that had been opened since 1974. In addition to survey information,
on-site evaluations of 32 of those facilities were conducted to discuss and
evaluate specific operational issues with administrators and staff. This
work identified the nature of the facilities and what "worked" about them
and what did not. The data revealed that many new facilities suffered from
a variety of design flaws and operational problems. Certain design features
were identified as driving factors in the general operational "success" or
"failure" of new small jails as perceived by staff and others charged with the
administration and funding of these facilities.
Survey and site visit findings were reported in the Nature of New Small
Jails: Report and Analysis released in 1985. In conducting the survey, the
project team identified several key planning issues that were problematic and
appeared to cause difficulties for many responding jurisdictions. A total of
nine issues were analyzed in a separate NIC publication entitled Small Jud
Special Issues released in 1986. Taken together, these two documents
represented Phase One of the NIC grant project.
The first edition of the Small Jail Design Guide represented the end-product
of Phase Two of the project. Since numerous NIC-sponsored documents
and training curricula had already explored the pre-design planning process,
this document attempted to avoid duplicating those discussions. Rather, it
sought to identify and describe those issues and architectural considerations
that directly assist the development of an efficient, standards-compliant, and
functionally effective design.
In filling the void of design-oriented information available to small and
medium-sized jails -- and jails in general -- the Jail Design Guide explores
the broad operational questions that drive a jail design and the specific
operational and design issues that must be addressed for each functional
component (e.g., intakelrelease, food services, housing). Architectural
responses to the issues are closely integrated with operational data as a way
of illustrating the link between jail activities and physical space design.