Abstract:
Growing population and their excessive use of plastic products have developed a serious
environmental and health hazard of microplastics in ecosystem. Microplastics have various
entry routes in agroecosystem where they cause negative impacts on plant and may enter
food chain and have indirect impact on human health. This causes a serious threat to food
security as well as to human health. Microplastics have shown to negatively impact plant
growth and performance. Microplastics can act as vector for various other contaminants,
and release toxic additives harmful for overall ecosystem. Biochar has been investigated
and proven to be a potential mitigation strategy for different pollutants and improves soil
health. However, there is little research information available on the use of biochar in
microplastic contaminated soils. Therefore, this study investigated the interactive effects
of microplastics (0, PVC=0.25%, PE=0.25% & PVC+PE=0.25%+0.25% w/w) and cotton
stalk (Gossypium hirsutum) biochar (0, 0.5% w/w) on mung bean (Vigna radiata) growth,
phytotoxicity, physiology, and antioxidant activity. Effects of these treatments were also
tested on soil properties and nutrients. Glasshouse experiment was conducted in ASAB,
NUST for 45 days to test the effects of these treatments on mung bean. Plant growth,
physiology, antioxidant activity, soil pH, soil EC and soil nutrition were analyzed to test
the effects of microplastics and biochar. MultispeQ device was used for measuring plant
physiology. Spectrophotometric absorption was done for estimation of antioxidant activity
using NBT photoreduction method, Guaiacol method and H2O2 method. Soil pH and EC
was measured using pH and EC meter, meanwhile soil phosphorus and potassium was
measured using spectrophotometer and flame photometer respectively. Results indicated
xix
that microplastics and biochar had no significant impact on plant length and fresh biomass.
PVC-MPs+PE-MPs combined contamination decreased shoot dry biomass (from 0% to -
26.21%). Biochar decreased shoot dry biomass (from 0 to -37%). Biochar had no
significant impact on the shoot-to-root ratio; however, SR ratio was increased in PE-MPs
and PVC+PE-MPs contaminated soils (from 0% to 37%). Microplastics elevated root
phytotoxicity, with PVC-MPs exhibiting highest phytotoxicity (from 0% to 24%),
meanwhile biochar decreased phytotoxicity with highest decrease in PVC+PE-MPs
contamination (from 20.2% to 1.2%), thus indicating mitigation of toxic effects of MPs by
biochar. Biochar enhanced chlorophyll content (0% to 13%) yet PVC+PE-MPs decreased
maximum fluorescence and chlorophyll content (from -27% to -10% and from -20.8% to
3.34% respectively). Additionally, biochar positively influenced non-photochemical
quenching, linear electron flow, and leaf thickness in combined microplastics
contamination (PVC+PE). Biochar also improved antioxidant activity for better response
against oxidative stress. While PVC improved electrical conductivity (from 0% to 38.2%)
yet biochar reduced it (from 38.2% to 3.6%), microplastics increased soil pH and available
phosphorus, but biochar reduced them to the level of uncontaminated soil. To conclude,
whereas microplastics, especially when combined, negatively impacted plant growth and
soil properties, biochar amendment had an ameliorating effect, particularly in lowering
phytotoxicity cause by microplastics and improving photosynthetic efficiency