dc.description.abstract |
In every expression of architecture, there arises a fundamental contradiction between
constancy and change. This innate quality of relative permanence is paradoxical to the
obstinacy of spaces that are considered to be "timeless". Is a timeless space ageless and locked
in it's time or one that is supposedly infinitely viable and is constantly in flux?
Over time, many architectural ideologies about 'Timelessness" have been expressed, some
carrying forward human tradition and ancient techniques, while others solely pushing for
architecture that updates itself in a machine-like manner. The question arises whether
timelessness is perceived as a characteristic of viability or as a stagnant exhibition of
insensitivity to the tangible and temporal context.
As fundamental human needs coincide with the evolution of behaviour, an architecture of
adaptation that caters to these ubiquitous, basic experiences is needed to be designed.
Through the course of this thesis, thorough literary research, architectural analyses and case
studies of "timeless spaces" led me to a relatively balanced and approachable understanding of
the timeless qualities of architecture.
Spaces that exhibit an evolving experiential appeal as well as a permanent functional
appropriateness are most easily characterized as timeless.
As per the application of this approach, the site of intervention needed to exhibit a connection
to the history and memory of the city, while at the same time have timelessness expressed
through its architecture or context. The abandoned site of the once prominent NAFDEC Cinema
was selected as a timeless work of architecture in of itself. Using the architectonic language of
this existing site, the intervention took care to retain the structure and to enhance it with an
expansion. The new structure will be derived from the grid of the original, composing the
volumes that displays a homogeneous relationship between the old and new, while maintaining
an appropriate degree of contrast.
The old and new stand together as both products of the technological capability of their time
but also as a revival of a lost function and a unified embodiment of the past, present and
future; all ceaselessly aging and ageless. |
en_US |