dc.description.abstract |
Water is one of the most abundant source in the world. Ground water fulfils much of
our needs However, the presence of certain salts, excess minerals and other hazardous
impurities may reduce the purity of the water. Salts have the most adverse effect in
this regard. It is mainly present in the order of 3-4% in water, and increased amount
reduces purity content of the water. Therefore it is imperative to separate salts from
the water. For this purpose, it is proposed to use a polymeric membrane, which
consists of TiO2 incorporated in a Polyamide (PA-6) matrix, or a polymer blend
membrane. Amine modification of the TiO2 helps in the capture of salts like CaCl2,
MgCl2 . The use of Polyamide loaded with TiO2 is helpful because of its flexible
structure and fixed but tunable pores. Blend membranes work in much the same way,
by including such groups in the matrix which have affinity for salts. In the present
work, synthesis of a series of polymer blend membranes, consisting of a blend of
polyamide (PA-6)/Formic Acid(FA) and DEMAC in an formic acid solvent system,
and membranes of consist of Polyamide-6 in FA matrix, synthesized from a solution
of the polymer and filler in formic Acid(FA) is carried out. These two membranes
were then tested for water permeation using single and mixed water permeation
testing (in water testing device which was designed), analyzed for their tensile
strength using the Ultimate Tensile Testing Machine, their morphology and surface
characteristics studied using SEM analysis and the presence of functional groups , salt
rejection % and TiO2 was confirmed using FT-IR ,UV and XRD spectroscopy. It was
found that the amino-modified TiO2 based PA membranes provided much better and
superior single and mixed salts rejection % of 97.50% and 98.45% respectively for
the membranes containing 20% polyamide (PA-6) in the formic acid, with
permeability up to 38.5 (L/m-2hr). The membranes also exhibited uniformly pores
structures, with pores observed under SEM magnifications up to 25000x. Moreover,
they had a maximum tensile strength of about 20.673 MPa to 39.56MPa. |
en_US |