Abstract:
Construction industry plays very decisive role in enhancing economic growth of a country.
As the famous quote says it all, “when the construction industry prospers, everything
prospers”. Construction industry being very much dynamic involves multiple stakeholders
for delivering construction projects and the diverged range of stakeholders possess contrast perceptions, which sets perfect recipe for conflict. Conflicts if not managed well propagates into disputes which hinders the successful completion of project significantly whose resolution usually ends up in litigation and leaves the parties in harsh relationship. Despite the extensive literature on disputes no integrated mechanism has been introduced to
incorporate the behavioral aspect of primary stakeholders and explore the CSFs for dispute avoidance. So this study in reference to introduce a dispute avoidance framework,
incorporates behavioral aspect of primary stakeholders CSFs for dispute avoidance and
fetches a Dispute avoidance maturity assessment model from it. The research is divided
into four basic stages (initial research, focused research, further research and advanced
research). In first stage preliminary literature review was carried out to explore the main
research area and followed by discussions with supervisor research gap was identified.
Later on, an extensive insight was performed via detailed literature review and factors
deemed to avoid disputes were extracted, tailed by detailed formal discussions and expert
reviews. A detailed methodology to bring off the planned research in order to achieve our
desired objectives thoroughly was decided and Fuzzy Set Theory (FST) was chosen to be
incorporated as our research approach. The phase of further research comprised of
questionnaire surveys for data collection. Two rounds survey solicited level of importance
from 91 and level of implementation from 50 respondents. Lastly, statistical analyses
screened the most critical factors known as CSFs which were subjected to FST and Fuzzy
Dispute Avoidance Maturity Assessment Model (FDAMAM) was established which
assessed the maturity of 21 CSFs, maturity of contractor, client and consultants involved
and overall maturity of the industry. Furthermore this model presented the individual
maturities and growth potentials of each CSF on the basis of which they are divided into
four quadrants. The respective maturities of consultant, client and contractors were further
explored through semi-structured interviews in case studies and summing up the overall
efforts of this research ‘An integrated strategy to effectively implement the dispute
avoidance framework’ was devised as a prime contribution to the practical aspect of CI.