Abstract:
In global market, responsiveness is the way to be competitive for the enterprises which have
the various part families. This can be achieved by the use of CAPP along with advanced
optimization techniques. Process planning optimization can be performed on the basis of total
production cost of a product. Total production cost consists of material handling cost (MHC),
machines and tool usage costs & machine, tool and setup change costs. In literature it is found
that MHC is not considered for optimization purposes. According to literature, MHC accounts
for 20-50% of total manufacturing cost of a product and by optimization, total manufacturing
cost can be reduced 15 to 30%. So, MHC must be considered while optimizing the process
plan. In this thesis MHC, along with other costs from literature, has been considered for the
process plan optimization. In literature, all the costs are in different ranges and multiplied by
different indices to make comparable. In this thesis, the normalization of each cost is
recommended for better results. Effect of each cost element is relatively controlled by their
corresponding normalized weights, i.e. increasing the effect of any cost results in decreasing
the effect of all other costs collectively. Genetic algorithm with edge selection encoding
strategy is used to find optimal process plans in MATLAB. The effect of material handling
cost vanished by switching off its weight function for benchmarking with previous work.
Convergence is performed to select suitable population size, crossover probability, mutation
probability and the stopping criteria for recent objective function. Effect of material handling
cost is checked by increasing the value of its weight (w6) gradually for first optimized process
plan (generated at w6=0). It is observed that material handling cost and total cost increase
gradually and sum of all other costs decreases with the rise of w6. A range for the value of w6
is selected where it comprises of near about 20% of the total cost. At this range different process
plans are generated and total cost of first optimized process plan is also re-calculated. In case
of increasing in the importance of MHE, a new process plan is generated. A comparison of
total costs of new process plans with first optimized process plan at the same value of w6 shows
that first optimized process plan becomes costly because it was not designed as MHC
perspective. It is recommended to add MHC to get optimized result for the cases where the
varieties of material handling equipment are available.