Abstract:
Aircraft handling qualities depend on the empennage geometry. The size and position
of tails along with the arrangement govern the stability and controllability of the aircraft.
However, the empennage also effects the aerodynamic efficiency of the aircraft by producing
additional drag force. By increasing the tail size, one can achieve better handling qualities,
however, this can negatively impact the aerodynamic efficiency by substantially increasing
the drag force. A comparison of different tail setups in terms of their contribution to stability
and controllability along with their impact on aerodynamic efficiency is done. The analysis
was performed using a Vortex Lattice Method. It was observed that the V-Tails provide best
stability and controllability characteristics with the lowest wetted area.
V-tail is a tail geometry setup that provides stability and controllability about
longitudinal and directional axes simultaneously. In addition, the setup has less wetted area
and interference, thus producing less drag as compared to conventional tails. The dihedral
angle of a V-tail determines its contribution to both longitudinal and lateral-directional
dynamics. However, there is no well-defined empirical method to compute the most suitable
dihedral angle for a V-tail in order to meet the required flying qualities. This work presents a
method to select the most appropriate dihedral angle of a V-tail to fulfill the requirements of
aircraft flying qualities. Numerical calculations were used to generate a complete flight
dynamics model with different tail dihedral angles. Subsequently, damping ratios for
longitudinal and lateral-directional modes were extracted from these models. Using a curve
fitting technique a polynomial was generated for longitudinal and lateral-directional damping
ratios against tail dihedral angle. It was observed that by increasing the tail dihedral the
longitudinal damping ratio was reduced. In addition, the lateral-directional damping ratio
increased with the increase in tail dihedral angle. The lower bound of the tail dihedral angle
was obtained using the lateral-directional damping limit in accordance to the flying qualities.
Similarly, the upper bound of the tail dihedral angle was obtained using the longitudinal
damping limit. The tail dihedral angle in between these bounds was found to be optimal for
adequate longitudinal and lateral-directional flying qualities. In addition, it was observed that
the mathematical model was not valid for a different flight dynamics model. This is due to
the change in aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft