dc.description.abstract |
The South China Sea, a crucial maritime region, has become a contentious arena where multiple
nations, including China, Vietnam, the Philippines, and others, assert conflicting territorial claims.
At the center of this dispute lies the principle of freedom of navigation, which is essential for
maintaining open sea lanes and ensuring global trade and security. However, China's assertive
behaviors, including the establishment of artificial islands and the establishment of excessive
maritime boundaries, directly challenge this principle. The confrontations in the South China Sea
have far-reaching implications for the stability of the Western security order. The theoretical
framework of offensive realism is employed to analyze the dynamics at play in this complex
geopolitical scenario. Through the application of offensive realism, the dissertation unveils the
strategic calculus of key actors in the South China Sea dispute, shedding light on their aggressive
pursuit of dominance in the maritime domain. The study employs a multi-faceted methodology,
combining content and thematic analysis alongside interviews with naval experts to derive primary
data. Secondary data is drawn from a comprehensive range of scholarly articles, journals, and
books, serving as references to enrich the research. By intertwining theoretical insights from
offensive realism this research seeks to illuminate the intricate connections between the South
China Sea disputes and broader implications for Western security order stability. |
en_US |