Abstract:
While co-branding is an inherent feature of contemporary politics,
designing, developing, and evaluating the combined potential of image and
positioning of a political co-brand is still a challenge for candidates, political
campaign managers, and political strategists. Despite being a crucial aspect of
connection with the electorates, researchers have overlooked the development of
frameworks on political co-brand image and positioning. This paucity of research on
the development and management of political co-brand image and positioning
indicates the need for more research. Also, the available literature gives unsettled
results regarding the negative spillover effects between the party brand and candidate
brands. Therefore, there have been calls for scholarly enquiry. Research was
therefore needed to deconstruct and operationalize the concept of co-brand image
and positioning; to identify key elements that are sensitive to the voters.
This sequential exploratory mixed method study has tried to fill these gaps
by exploring and examining the political co-brand image through the lens of
positioning concept from the external stakeholder’s perspective. Revisiting an
existing framework, this study contributes to the stream of literature on the political
brand image and positioning. Revisiting aided in evaluating an already existing
framework’s strength and applicability in a different setting, context and for the
concept of political co-brand image and positioning. It also helped in presenting a
critical perspective and in making a viable contribution to the body of knowledge
regarding the limited research available on political co-brand image, positioning and
the negative image transference between co-brands and corporate brand.
Qualitative study explores political co-brand image, positioning, and
negative image transference. The analysis of the data collected from a sample of
political analysts resulted in the development of an all-encompassing framework,
named as the Political Co-brand Image and Positioning Framework. The
quantitative strand is built on the qualitative study’s findings. With the introduction
of a new construct (political brand positioning and political marketing, PBPM) to
the body of knowledge, this strand not only offer a way to measure political brand image and positioning but also confirms the capability of the newly developed
framework, with a different set of respondents (sample of electorates).
It is expected that the insights this study offers will help researchers,
political campaign managers, political strategists and public policy makers with a
focus on improving political marketing strategies, in in formulating appropriate
marketing and public policies and in fixing co-brand image alignment by comparing
desired and actual positioning.