Abstract:
Glioblastoma, a lethal form of brain cancer, poses a significant challenge in the field of oncology
due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. The transmembrane protein TMEM16A,
also known as CaCC (Calcium-activated chloride channel), has emerged as a potential therapeutic
target for its involvement in tumorigenic processes and its dysregulation in glioblastoma. This
study investigated the modulation of TMEM16A in glioblastoma and explored its potential as a
drug target. To understand the complex regulatory mechanisms governing TMEM16A's role in
glioblastoma, a knowledge based BRN of TMEM16A and other relevant molecular players
implicated in glioblastoma progression was constructed. This knowledge-driven BRN provided a
systems-level understanding of the intricate interactions and signaling pathways contributing to
the aberrant behavior of glioblastoma cells. Subsequently, dynamic simulations of the network
were performed using Boolean logic parameters to analyze the dynamic behavior of the regulatory
network under normal and pathophysiological conditions. These simulations facilitated the
identification of key regulatory nodes and potential therapeutic targets, including TMEM16A, for
glioblastoma treatment. By simulating the response of the BRN to different perturbations and
concentrations, the network's stability and potential vulnerabilities were evaluated for therapeutic
interventions. Furthermore, molecular dynamic simulations of Tmem16A were performed to probe
the structural stability of Tmem16A and its ligand bound complexes. The current study highlighted
that hyper-activation of TMEM16A is associated with diseased conditions, which could be
maintained to its normal state by introducing an inhibitor in the BRN. Furthermore, protein ligand
interaction profiling of Tmem16A with four shortlisted inhibitors of this channel i.e.
CaCC(inh)A01, MONNA, Niclosamide, & NPPB depicted that a residue ARG788, present in the
binding pocket located in the neck region of this protein might be important for the interaction
between Tmem16A and these ligands. Also two residues, LYS839 & PRO365 might be crucial
for achieving activity or potency against Tmem16A. It is also possible that the inhibitors of this
channel might share an overlapping binding site. Overall, this study unveils the role of TMEM16A
in glioblastoma, showing ways to potential therapeutic interventions against Glioblastoma
Multiforme.